What impact does rivalry between different classes of MSPs have on governance?

Rivalry between different classes of Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) can significantly impact governance by potentially creating conflicts over shared responsibilities. When MSPs from different political parties or factions disagree on policies or approaches to governance, it can lead to competition rather than cooperation. This rivalry may cause disputes regarding the prioritization of issues, allocation of resources, and approaches to achieving objectives, ultimately leading to gridlock or delays in decision-making.

In the context of governance, such conflicts can hinder the implementation of policies and prevent the parliament from effectively addressing the needs of the public. For instance, differing views on issues like education funding, health care, or environmental regulation can lead to partisan battles that focus more on party loyalty than on collaborative, effective governance. This dynamic underscores the importance of finding common ground and the challenges posed by political rivalry in a multi-party system like Scotland's, where various classes of MSPs represent a range of interests and viewpoints.